https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873817 came up for discussion in the blocker meeting today, and highlighted an inadequacy in the criteria. An Alpha criterion currently reads: "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" However, the intent here is that all packages on the media should be installable, excepting combinations of packages with explicit Conflicts: between them. This bug shows a case where the error isn't a non-explict conflict or a bad dep, but a scriptlet error. Clearly, the criterion is too narrow. We agreed in principle at the meeting to amend the criterion to cover any critical packaging error. So I propose this wording: There must be no errors in any package on the DVD or release-blocking live desktop media which cause the package to fail to install. Such critical errors include, but are not limited to, undeclared conflicts (explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) and unresolved dependencies Comments, thoughts, rotten fruit? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
