Re: Beta status: blockers, karma etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 00:35:43 -0800,
  Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

systemd was in TC9, so you can upkarma based on TC9 testing. The texlive
update is a blocker only for reasons of taking up lots of space on the
DVD - normal testing that it still works, deps are sane etc should be
all it needs.

I don't know that it would be a blocker, but there are still older versions of passivetex and xmltex which don't look like they should be in the repos any more since it looks like texlive-passivetex and texlive-xmltex are intended to replace them and have file conflicts with texlive-xmltex. There is also dblatex which doesn't seem to be replaced by anything in texlive (it's not obsoleted and there isn't a texlive-dblatex) which pulls in passivetex and xmltex (which conflict with texlive-xmltex).
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux