#322: New release criterion: no X libs in the minimal install set
-------------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Release criteria | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-------------------------------+----------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Alternative implementations might be:
B. More vague about the specifics: "No package in the minimal install set
may have a dependency chain which includes a graphical windowing system.
Packages must split functionality requiring this into subpackages, or be
removed from the minimal package set."
C. Move specifics entirely to Some Other Place, as many of the existing
release criteria do: "No package in the minimal install set may have a
dependency chain which includes a package in the list of packages not
allowed in the minimal install. Packages must split functionality
requiring these dependencies into subpackages, or be removed from the
minimal package set."
I'm not keen on B because it seems prone to misinterpretation. Option C
would be fine, but I think the extra level of indirection is unnecessary
complication in this case.
T
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/322#comment:11>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
