> Well I see your point, but it kind of cuts both ways - Josef clearly > got > confused by a few cases where we overload test cases to test several > different things, so you can argue that it's actually more > 'accessible' > when we try to stick to 'one test case tests one thing'. But your > approach would achieve what we need to achieve indeed. /me feels a bit ashamed :D I'm all for 'one test case tests one thing', even though I understand, that having several 'similar' testcases which differ in just few words is nonsense (as I got equally confused with the _almost the same_ criterions in alpha/beta). J. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
