On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. So I'm sorry this is a bit late, but I've been working on > the proposed partitioning criteria for F18, and here's what I've got: So an update here: there's various additional proposals in the thread, but no objections to the proposals I made for Alpha and Beta. These proposals were additionally discussed and agreed with minor changes at the QA meeting this morning. So I've gone ahead and edited the Alpha and Beta criteria pages in line with the proposals as revised and accepted at the QA meeting: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria&diff=305114&oldid=303697 https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria&diff=305117&oldid=303021 (I know Alpha is done already, but we apply Alpha criteria at Beta and Final release time too, so we need those to be correct; it's not pointless to edit the Alpha criteria). Of course, this doesn't close the partitioning topic finally or anything, we can continue to discuss the further proposals people have come up with on the list or at the meeting and add them to the criteria. But there was broad agreement on _at least_ the requirements I've added, AFAICT no-one seems to feel they over-reached in any way, and we need something in place to evaluate proposed blockers and the freezeability of 18 for Beta release, so it seemed good to get these baseline criteria in place ASAP. Please do continue to propose any extensions or improvements you can think of to these criteria, thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
