On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 04:25 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > 'The installer must be able to install each of the release blocking > > > desktops, as well as the minimal package set, for each supported > > > installation method (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)' > > > > > > Comments please. > > > > I'm fine with that except I'd just drop the "(DVD, live, netinst, > > PXE, ...)". We know what installation methods are, and different ones > > are supported at different release phases, and the requirements may > > change over time; seems safer not to include it, to me. > > The idea was to give an explanation what an 'installation method' > means, because sometimes even QA members have a hard time to remember > all of that. But I agree it's not ideal to explain it anywhere we > mention it. > > Maybe we could create a glossary then? On the main criteria page, > there would be a glossary of > term: explanation > > And we could even hyperlink the complex phrases to their explanation. Yup, I've thought about doing something like that before. We do it in a kind of haphazard way at present, sometimes defining things in the preamble, sometimes defining things within criteria; there are problem enough 'special phrases' by now that it'd make sense to do something more organized like this. Drafts welcome! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
