Re: Better educating about what Alpha, Beta, Release means

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 21:41 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 19:20:02 -0700,
>    Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >I agree the current conventions could be improved. We really should 
> >get around to this between 18 and 19. We have various proposals lying 
> >around in the list archives for changing the naming of RCs and TCs, 
> >and we also have proposals for changing the blocker bug aliases 
> >(kinda related). I also agree we should stop using the word 'gold' 
> >for Alphas and Betas (for the record, QA does not do so, it comes in 
> >with the release announcements, which are FPL/program manager stuff.)
> 
> Maybe we could call the final Alpha bronze and the final Beta silver?

Could get even simpler...

Alpha is "Ready to Release, or Ready to Test, or just Ready"

Beta is "Ready to release, Ready to Test, or just Ready"

-- 
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY

"Best little town on Earth!"

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux