Re: libvirt in F18?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/2012 11:13 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 08:46 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> After doing a yum upgrade on my desktop from F17 to F18, libvirtd
>> would not start up (see below for the errors from the log)  I grabbed
>> libvirt 0.10.1-2 from koji and things are working now.  Was there some
>> other fix that would have gotten things working again?
> Just an unfortunate side effect of when alpha froze; where netcf and
> libvirt have to be upgraded in lockstep to either both use libnl1 or
> libnl3, but the freeze happened to catch netcf at libnl3 but libvirt at
> libnl1.

Actually, I don't think that's correct. From what I can see, netcf in
the F18 stable repo is at 0.1.9-1, which is still using libnl1. It's
only people who are using the updates-testing repo that will get the
newer netcf-0.2.2-1, which links against libnl3. (I've requested that
netcf-0.2.2-1 be promoted to stable, but that won't happen until the
freeze is lifted).


>   For more details,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853381
>
>>  Is there a
>> reason that libvirt 0.10.1-2 hasn't been submitted as an update?
> It _has_ been submitted as an update; it's just that updates-testing
> can't be merged yet due to branching rules of the alpha freeze, without
> declaring 853381 as an alpha blocker, but I don't think the blocker
> rules apply to this one (IIRC, we don't have to self-host virtualization
> until beta, at which point this would be a blocker).

Nope. libvirt-0.10.1-2 hasn't been submitted as an update, and isn't in
updates-testing yet. If that was done, then at least all of the repos
would be internally consistent - the packages for alpha would be
libvirt-0.10.0rc0-1 and netcf-0.1.9-1 (both linking against libnl-1.1),
and the packages in updates-testing would be libvirt-0.10.1-2 (or
possibly a newer build) and netcf-0.2.2-1 (both linking against
libnl-3). This would eliminate problems for everyone except those
manually updating individual packages, or building their own packages
from upstream.

Note that it currently *is* possible to put a package into
updates-testing, it's just not possible to promote it to stable until
the alpha freeze is lifted.

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux