On 08/31/2012 06:30 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> On 08/31/2012 03:57 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> >>> Do you think it's a good idea to add also a link to our new blocker >>> bugs page [1] to the announcement, or is there way too many links >>> already? >>> >>> Kamil >>> >>> [1] http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ >> >> How about adding the following? (Changed for each milestone, of >> course.) >> >> Fedora 18 Alpha Blockers >> http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/18/alpha > > If we include this, I think we can remove links to Blocker and NTH tracker bugs in Bugzilla (you can always find that by opening any bug listed there and traverse through the Blocks: field). > > Also please note that > http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current > always points to the currently active milestone. The drawback is that there is no clear way how to switch milestones. There are some improvements from Tim Flink on their way that should solve this. Currently I would either use /current or just the top-level link. Can the Blocker and NTH bug links be posted on the corresponding blockerbugs page? Having to open an arbitrary bug and traverse through the Blocks: field seems unnatural, plus it's possible that there may not be any bugs to traverse (for example when the Blocker and NTH bugs are first created).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
