Re: Draft: compendium image validation testing matrix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-08-13 5:39, Kamil Paral wrote:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Compendium_image_validation_results_template#Boot_and_sub-image_selection

so 'multi_auto' would just be 'leave it, and check it does the right
thing', 'multi_manual' would be a test case that's something like
'try
every entry besides basic video / memtest / local boot and make sure
they respond appropriately', and the other three are obvious - we
probably don't really need to do those three on both arches, we could
split out a small table for those, I guess.

This table is pretty neat.

One thing though: I find "Multi-Live" and "Multi-DVD" names more
straightforward than "Multi-Desktop" and "Multi-Install" (this one
takes me a while to decipher). But that might be my personal feeling
only.

Glad we're on the same wavelength now! Anyone else have comments?

On the names: I used the same names from the Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Checksums test case, for consistency. But I'm not sure if we have 'official' names for these, really. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/MediaArt/F17 isn't terribly consistent about what it calls them. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multi_Boot_Media_SOP goes with 'Multi Desktop DVD' and 'Dual Arch Installer DVD'. Maybe we need to come up with something official :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux