On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 10:27 -0400, clumens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I'm not sure the change is really necessary...the text says 'all > > supported interfaces'. If what's officially 'supported' for newUI is > > graphical, VNC and possibly text, then the criterion is correct without > > modification. > > Seems like we're splitting hairs here but sure. The criteria are pretty much about splitting hairs, correctly =) > > Practically speaking I read the criterion as meaning that all offered > > interfaces must work. So the onus here is really on the anaconda team to > > do something fairly simple - don't allow users to trigger any modes that > > won't work. Only the working modes should be exposed via any kind of UI > > choice, kernel parameter, kickstart parameter etc: none of those things > > should let you kick off an installation using an interface that won't > > work. CCing clumens for that. > > Right now if you try to do a non-graphical installation method, the > install halts with a message saying only graphical is supported. With > the work going on with text mode right now, I'm not likely to do > anything more to block people from doing text mode. It looks like > that'll just be wasted effort before too much longer. Sure - it doesn't really need to be consistent 100% of the time throughout the cycle, just it'd be good to be consistent at least at the time of Beta and Final releases. Alpha is more a 'bonus points' situation. And the current situation as described above sounds good enough to me per the existing criteria in any case. Thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
