On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 07:19 -0700, Joe Wulf wrote: > Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be > moved to? > That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are > maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in > this release. > > > Just a thought. As far as I remember, it's not something we've really done before - we've waived specific bugs occasionally, with various degrees of process hackery and hand-waving, but that's all. However, there's no reason at all we can't do it. Actually I was going to suggest something similar. If we decided it was the right thing to do, it'd be pretty trivial to grey-out or strike-out a criterion, with a note that it's suspended for the specific release in question. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
