----- Original Message ----- > We need to pay special attention to the half implementation of the > preset feature [1] that Red Hat club that FESCO is, decided should > take > place. Red Hat Club? Mitr, the Red Hatter voted -1 because of "<mitr> kay: right, and my election platform said "time-definite migrations". So I'm forced to be -1" ;-) > The feature it self is much needed and appreciated however not making > the switch in a single release cycle after all the legacy sysv script > have been migrated native systemd units will leave us in a pile of > shit > to deal with where *some*'packages ( and spins ) will use preset and > others not. It's still possible to implement it within single release cycle. Just there has to be community buy in. And at least spins with DMs would have to step into. R. > We need to pay special attention to those packages ( and spins ) that > will get the preset treatment with regards to potential upgrade > problems > ( enable/disable of service etc ) and other fallout that might occur. > > Arguably we ( QA ) should take a firm stance against this being > implement into the distribution like this since this change will span > over several release cycles. > > Regards > JBG > > 1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
