On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:49 -0400, clumens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Chris, if you have any amendments to the above or the list of tests on > > the Wiki page, please let us know! Thanks. If anyone's unclear about > > this whole thing, which I pretty much just threw together at 10pm after > > a couple of beers, do ping me, here or on IRC. > > Having looked at the first couple results reported on the wiki page, I'm > not sure how I should offer comments on them. For instance, a couple > things I already know about, a couple are excluded by TestableUI, and at > least one is NOTABUG. I'm not sure it's actually necessary for you to provide comments on each issue individually, as the point of the testing at this point is just to flag up issues for your attention; I don't think at this stage of development we need to assume any kind of 'customer service' element where the reporters expect to hear back from you about the problem. It's not like the problem is actually materially affecting them - at least it shouldn't be, with all the disclaimers about only using the image for testing. As long as you see the feedback that's provided, I'd say we've achieved the goal. For any feedback that looks both valid and new, or NEEDSINFO, you could get in touch with the reporter directly - all the feedback should be attributed - or discuss it on this list... Sound reasonable? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
