On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 18:34 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 06/27/2012 06:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It's hardly 'sticking their nose in'. The updates policy is owned by > > FESCo, not by us. > > WooT? > > > In practice, I'd say the point is kinda moot because > > this is clearly Bodhi 2.0 stuff, and we've been waiting for Bodhi 2.0 > > forever and a day, and it'll be very different from current Bodhi, so we > > should probably just keep waiting for it and re-evaluate the whole > > process once it_finally_ arrives. > > I disagree we should reach decision now and have it implement ( or not ) > when bodh 2.0 finally arrives. > > It kinda goes without saying that it's better for the developers to add > it now rather then after they release + it would give us time to test it That's a point, actually. But we'd need to look at it within the broader context of how Bodhi 2.0 is actually designed, because it's not at all designed around the Bodhi 1.0 concept of 'one numeric karma value and a comment box'. Luke, would you be available to join the QA meeting at 1500 UTC on Monday, for a discussion about Bodhi 2.0 and some possible feedback from us into the design? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
