On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to > packaging it. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Yes, I noticed the separate libraries but was doing a minimal packaging job. I wonder, is the package name "libnettle" acceptable? Generally the main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is just nettle. Also, the Requires: on the sub-packages should probably be arch specific, i.e.: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} should be Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Richard -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
