On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:31:37 -0600 Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:25:38 -0400 (EDT) > Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So, we still need karma on pretty much all of those updates. I've > > > built > > > a test boot.iso to help with testing the installation related > > > updates: > > > > > > http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20120424_f17-preTC1.x64.boot.iso > > > http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20120424_f17-preTC1.x64.boot.iso.sha256 > > > > Petr Schindler saw F16 logo in the installer, which is weird. Where > > it comes from? > > I think that it's either part of anaconda or comes from fedora-logos > but I can't remember for certain. > > Looking through my build logs, anaconda-17.22-1 and > fedora-logos-17.0.0-1 were pulled in and I don't think that there is > anything wrong with the image (famous last words ...). > > I'd try to verify but it doesn't look like that'll happen until the > mirrormanager issues are worked out. I imagine that will be soon, > though. > > Tim Scratch that - it looks like a bunch of really old builds got pulled in to that image and I was looking at other builds the first time I read the logs. It's an odd amalgamation of bleeding edge and ancient (months old) pacakges. I'm really not sure how that happened since I re-downloaded all of the source packages when the image was built. _sigh_ ... looks like I'll be doing another test image - maybe that'll fix the EFI issue, too. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
