On 04/17/2012 11:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 22:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 04/17/2012 09:32 PM, Bahtiar Gadimov wrote: >>> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 20:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> So, what component is responsible? I think it could use a bugzilla....unless it has >>>> already been reported. >>> Shouldn't you report that directly to gnome? >>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi >>> >>> >> In the past, bugzillas that weren't specific to Fedora were "kicked upstairs" by the >> fedora package maintainer. Is that no longer the case? > It is, but if we already know it's not a Fedora-specific bug, why not > cut out the middleman and save everyone time and trouble? OK.... But do we *know* that simply because it is GNOME and no customization is done and no Fedora specific patches are applied? > >> Besides, I'm a KDE user. So, I've no clue as to what component within GNOME this >> should be reported against. Is is only a configuration issue? > I wouldn't worry too much about it. Just pick Shell or Nautilus, it'll > get corrected by the maintainer if it's wrong I love black boxes. Sure would like to know how the "insert" process is handled and where these decisions are made. Well, I suppose I'll just file it upstream (the term I couldn't recall) when I wake up. -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on the joke of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
