On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:44 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote: > > > > As mentioned before, "Show Plymouth boot screen" mentioned "FAILED". > > > It asked me to check > > > > I've seen that fail in all my test installs, but it hasn't actually > > prevented boot. > > Package "plymouth" was not installed here. Huh? > > That also breaks plymouth-scripts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/794894 > > After installing "plymouth", I got the boot animation _and_ the LUKS > passphrase prompt! Heh. Well, that would explain it. It does seem like nothing compels the installation of plymouth. plymouth itself is not listed in comps, only: comps-f17.xml.in: <packagereq type="default">plymouth-system-theme</packagereq> but plymouth-system-theme doesn't require plymouth, directly or indirectly. The only things that *do* require plymouth are plymouth-devel and sugar-logos. I'll have to look at F16 and see what changed there... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
