On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote: > >> >> Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself. >> >> >> >> Harald? >> > >> > I was about to follow up. I tried rebuilding the rc6 kernel's >> > initramfs but there was no joy. I then managed to boot with the rc6 >> > kernel using the rc4 initramfs. >> > >> > I've unpacked my the rc4 and rc6 initramfs's to take a look but have >> > had to go back to real work... >> >> Unpacked initramfs-3.3.0-0.rc1.git4.1.fc17.i686.img to "~/rc4" and >> initramfs-3.3.0-0.rc1.git6.1.fc17.i686.img to "~/rc6": >> >> [root@localhost ~]# find . -name 'libc.so.6' >> ./rc4/run/initramfs/lib/libc.so.6 >> [root@localhost ~]# > > The initramfs is generated on-the-fly when the kernel is installed. So I > suspect the bug here is correctly described as 'When installing any > kernel package after doing the /usr move updates, the generated > initramfs will not contain /lib/libc.so.6' - i.e. the actual kernel > package in question doesn't matter, it's rather that any attempt to > generate an initramfs after doing the /usr move will fail. This is > obviously a significant problem, if I'm correct. Bug submitted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786261 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
