Re: New criterion for reporting failure of installer and accessing debug mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:29 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> I propose final criterion: 
> 
> "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the
> issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode."
> 
> We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature.
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode

Well, we already have a criterion for 'reporting a failure to Bugzilla'.
We also have some more test cases without matching criteria -
"QA:Testcase Anaconda save traceback to remote system" and
"QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk". Perhaps we need a more
comprehensive approach here.

The existing criterion at Alpha is:

"The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with
appropriate information included"

So following that model, we could have:

"The installer must be able to enter debugging mode on encountering a
failure"

at Final. Not sure if we want to also add criteria for remote system and
disk, or if we want to downgrade those to non-blocking tests, but right
now they're marked as Alpha, so we should do something.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux