On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 18:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. So, currently the Beta criteria state: > > "The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods" > > This is probably over-ambitious for Beta. We have some pretty odd > kickstart delivery methods: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_File_Path_Ks_Cfg > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Hd_Device_Path_Ks_Cfg > > that are only really useful in pretty unusual scenarios. In fact the > first of these is broken in F16 Beta and we decided to go ahead and > release it anyway (on the basis that we agreed this criterion should be > changed, which is why I'm proposing a change now), and the world has not > ended. > > I'd propose at least this much change: > > for Beta, the criterion should read > > "The installer must be able to use the HTTP and NFS kickstart delivery > methods" > > as those are the two that are really useful in most situations, and we > move > > "The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods" > > to be a Final criterion. Thoughts? The Beta criterion is a bit more > 'technology-specific' than I usually like to make the criteria, but I > don't think we're that likely to discover any exciting new protocols in > the foreseeable future, so specifying HTTP and NFS is probably > reasonably future-proof. Ping on this one: any further thoughts? Didn't get much response the first time out. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
