On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So does anaconda expose the full set of mkfs options, since you are now > artificially restricting running mkfs in %pre? Since apparently this change doesn't affect ks installs, I'm fine with it - it makes a ton of sense. It would be interesting to know what particular options you use that aren't exposed by anaconda in ks, but somewhat irrelevant. We dynamically decide disk partitioning in %pre, but implement that via writing out a file to include in the kickstart in /tmp, which seems the more sane way to do it. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
