On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 08:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:51:05 -0700, > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > test in whatever setups you can. The intended behaviour is that if you > > yum update a system with grub installed from a repo with both packages > > available, grub will be replaced with both grub-efi and grub2. > > Post-update, grub should still be in the MBR so the system should still > > boot, switching to grub2 in the MBR at present still requires manual > > intervention. Together with the fix for > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 these updates should > > cause preupgrades to work, but it's a bit hard to test, I think, as > > you'd have to give preupgrade a custom repo containing those packages to > > work from. I'm sure you can do that, but I don't know the process off > > the top of my head. Otherwise it'll have to wait till they propagate out > > to updates-testing. > > I also tested removing and adding kernels after this update. Other than > some grubby messages that might be a bit scary to people, things worked > as expected. I just gave +0s since I didn't really test grub-efi or grub2, > just that the existing grub setup didn't get busted and would work > going forward. That would be worth a +1, really (and I've tested the EFI side). If you could change your comment to a +1 that'd be great. Anyone else, please test and karma grub - we really want 83 in tc1 not 80. thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
