On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:25:19 +0000 (UTC), J (JB) wrote:
>
> > I think you criticize him unjustly.
Perhaps. I am getting tired of the protests to grub2 and every other
thing that changes.
>
> grub2-mkconfig is just a brute-force shell script that ends with
>
> # none of the children aborted with error, install the new grub.cfg
> mv -f ${grub_cfg}.new ${grub_cfg}
>
> so instead of not shipping an incompatible /etc/grub2.cfg symlink as
> long as this tool obviously cannot handle the symlink, there are lame and
> dubious attempts at defending the symlink.
I personally think we should not ship the symlink, mainly because it is
superfluous. Seriously, is '/etc/grub2.cfg' so much easier to remember
(or type) than '/boot/grub2/grub.cfg'? Nope.
>
> --
> Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc16.x86_64
> loadavg: 0.00 0.04 0.05
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
