On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:18:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 01:22:38PM +1100, Norman Gaywood wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:23:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 10:41 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > > > Specifically, do we want to have Xen DomU support as a final release > > > > criteria? > > Bug 550724 - xen PV guest kernel 2.6.32 processes lock up in D state > .. which is fixed in 2.6.39 IMHO. Yes. > > What would be also useful is to be able to have guests larger than 32G > > without rebuilding the kernel. > Hm, that ought to work (2.6.39 and later) ? Do you have a BZ for this? > The default limit is 128G: > CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128 Great. I had not checked the later kernels. Sorry for the noise. My main point is that a broken Xen DomU in the final release would be a pain for me. Just wanted to add a +1. -- Norman Gaywood, Computer Systems Officer University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia ngaywood@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: +61 (0)2 6773 3337 http://mcs.une.edu.au/~norm Fax: +61 (0)2 6773 3312 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
