F16 Beta Blocker Bug Review #5 minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



======================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-blocker-review
======================================

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* rollcall  (tflink, 17:01:07)

* why are we here?  (tflink, 17:05:57)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 17:06:10)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
    (tflink, 17:06:36)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (tflink, 17:07:06)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736793  (tflink, 17:08:03)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736793   (tflink,
    17:08:07)
  * gdm 3.1.90-1 No way to reboot or shutdown system from gdm  (tflink,
    17:08:17)
  * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253   (tflink,
    17:08:59)
  * agreed that the beta release critera are a bit too strict, should be
    modified such that this isn't a bug  (tflink, 17:27:07)
  * the release criteria could be reworded to say there needs to be a
    working way to shut gracefully using a gui interface. So if you can
    shutdown from either gdm or gnome (for desktop spin) things are good
    enough for beta.  (tflink, 17:28:23)
  * AGREED: - 736793 - RejectedBlocker - This bug does hit the release
    criteria but the fix involves pulling in a new version of shell and
    other packages - too big to retest this late. This will be fixed by
    final  (tflink, 17:29:00)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737532  (tflink, 17:29:56)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737532   (tflink,
    17:30:00)
  * FormatDestroyError: error wiping old signatures from /dev/sda-1: 1
    (tflink, 17:30:09)
  * AGREED: - 737532 - AcceptedNTH - This is a fix for a bug that came
    out of another NTH, would be nice to have fixed for beta  (tflink,
    17:31:46)

* Unable to make system bootable due to bootloader choice  (tflink,
  17:32:52)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738964   (tflink,
    17:33:01)
  * needs testing with
    http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img  (tflink,
    17:34:11)
  * there is an alternative update available that doesn't use quite so
    big of a hammer -
    http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img  (tflink,
    17:35:16)
  * there are patches on anaconda-devel@ that should be built in to
    today, no problems expected in getting a new build  (tflink,
    17:36:33)

* (739746) dhcp / bind mismatch on f15 to f16 upgrade: no network
  (tflink, 17:37:34)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739746   (tflink,
    17:37:40)
  * builds are available, need more testing and karma  (tflink,
    17:37:56)

* (739253) - unable to shut down from gdm greeter  (tflink, 17:38:43)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253   (tflink,
    17:38:49)
  * this particular bug could be fixed by pulling in gdm-3.1.92 only
    without the rest of that update  (tflink, 17:45:41)
  * gnome-shell still wouldn't have PM options @ gdm greeter, but what
    is there would work  (tflink, 17:46:03)
  * pulling in gdm-3.1.92 needs more testing to verify that it can be
    pulled in alone  (tflink, 17:48:46)
  * AGREED: - 739253 - Assuming that it can be pulled in by itself,
    pulling in gdm-3.1.92 alone sounds like a reasonable solution to fix
    this particular bug even though it won't touch 736793. This needs to
    be tested more before pulling it in to beta release, though
    (tflink, 17:50:40)

* (738735) repoclosure failure for 16-Beta.RC1 DVD  (tflink, 17:51:11)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738735   (tflink,
    17:51:17)
  * LINK: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13116
    (tflink, 17:52:27)
  * digikam was recently pushed to stable  (tflink, 17:52:42)
  * this bug should be fixed @ next compose  (tflink, 17:52:51)
  * AGREED: - 738735 - Need to confirm fixed in RC2 and close  (tflink,
    17:53:54)

* (737731) Bootloader is left in F15 configuration when preupgrading to
  F16  (tflink, 17:54:04)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731   (tflink,
    17:54:14)
  * fix for this will be in F15's preupgrade  (tflink, 17:54:46)
  * since fix for 737731 is in F15, it isn't blocking compose  (tflink,
    17:55:43)
  * proposed solution in
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731#c13  (tflink,
    17:56:36)

* (735866) boot hangs with udevadm settle - timeout of 120 seconds
  (tflink, 17:59:09)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866   (tflink,
    17:59:15)
  * AGREED: - 735866 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedNTH - This has turned out
    to be a little less common and severe than we originally thought. If
    it turns out to be a bigger issue, re-propose as blocker  (tflink,
    18:04:41)

* open floor  (tflink, 18:05:21)
  * ACTION: tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the
    updates for 738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what
    we're looking for in testing and data for feedback  (tflink,
    18:07:26)
  * digikam update for 738735 had issues with pushing for stable, it has
    been fixed and should show up with the next push to stable  (tflink,
    18:08:25)
  * next blocker meeting (if needed) will be 2011-09-30 @ 17:00 UTC
    (tflink, 18:09:31)

Meeting ended at 18:10:53 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
  738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking for
  in testing and data for feedback




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
  * tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
    738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking
    for in testing and data for feedback
* tflink
  * tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
    738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking
    for in testing and data for feedback
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (157)
* jdulaney (41)
* adamw (39)
* nirik (24)
* brunowolff (19)
* buggbot (15)
* jsmith (10)
* zodbot (5)
* fenrus02 (2)
* clumens (2)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux