On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/15/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:19 -0400, Dan Scott wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote: >>>>> I downloaded http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Beta.RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-16-Beta-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso >>>>> and wrote it to a LiveUSB; system with i915 graphics boots up but is >>>>> in the GNOME 3 "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" loop. gsettings-data >>>>> was repeatedly reporting: >>>>> >>>>> "segfault at 18 ip ... error 4 in libgio-2.0.so.0.29990" >>>>> >>>>> and avc was reporting: >>>>> >>>>> "avc: denied {read} for pid=766 comm="dbus-daemon" >>>>> path="/home/liveuser/.local/share/icc/edid-eaf3aa369b5533aad29891cf327dd3d7.icc" >>>>> dev=dm-0 ino=147569 >>>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 >>>>> tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:data_home_t:s0 tclass=file >>>>> >>>>> Tried rebooting and the same thing happened again. >>>>> >>>>> Curiously, the TC2 Live image worked just fine earlier this morning; I >>>>> was about to try an install and thought it would be best to use the >>>>> beta now that it was announced. >>>> >>>> If you boot with 'enforcing=0' does that help? >>> >>> Yep. I went ahead and downloaded the x86_64 DVD installer for beta >>> RC1, installed, and when I logged in it began the "Oh no!" loop again. >>> >>> Rebooting with enforcing=0 fixed that. >> >> Oop - if multiple people are seeing this, it sounds bad. Strange that I >> didn't hit it when I built a test live image with what I thought was the >> full RC1 package set. >> >> Can someone please file a bug using sealert (if you booted in permissive >> mode, the AVCs should still show up and be reportable) and mark it as a >> Beta blocker? Thanks! > > For some reason, selaert didn't detect any issues but I grabbed the > errors by hand. Reported and marked as beta blocker: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738803 Thanks Tim. I was getting there but slower than you :) I can confirm, fwiw, that I didn't see any sealerts popping up once I was in enforcing=0, but the avc's were in dmesg. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test