> Subject: Release criteria: virtualization tweak > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0700 > CC: pjones@xxxxxxxxxx > > Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the > Beta virt criterion: > > "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation > where the virtual host is running the same release (using Fedora's > current preferred virtualization technology)" > > doesn't really imply that virtual host functionality must work; only > that _if_ virtual host functionality is working, then virtual guest > functionality must work. This was not really our intent with the > criterion, we intended to require both to work at Beta stage. So here's > a proposed improvement: > > "The release must be able to self-host using Fedora's current preferred > virtualization technology: that is, the release must be able to act as a > virtual host, and must also successfully install and boot as a virtual > guest when running on a host which is also running the release" > > I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer. > Any better ideas? Are we assuming that this is on CPUs that support Fedora's preferred virt technology? I do believe that KVM doesn't do so well on older CPUs. John -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test