Re: F16 Beta Blocker Bug Review #2 Minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2011/9/6 Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
>
> Tim

I looked at that list and have not noticed any "glibc/gcc/* can
corrupt your *" problems. I wonder how much would be safe for me to
update to F16? I use my server for web development - php things,
python, mysql, postgresql, cherokee, apache, git, samba, memcache,
lucene - these are programs that I care most about. I have no pressure
when it comes to use new features, I want to test HekaFS, also Xen
support looks promising. Do I have to use GRUB2 if I upgrade to F16?


> ======================================
> #fedora-bugzappers: F16-blocker-review
> ======================================
>
> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.html
> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.txt
> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02-17.00.log.html
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---------------
> * roll call  (tflink, 17:01:09)
>
> * Introduction  (tflink, 17:05:56)
>  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
>    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
>    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
>    bugs.  (tflink, 17:06:06)
>  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
>    (tflink, 17:06:25)
>  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
>    (tflink, 17:06:39)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728923  (tflink, 17:08:03)
>  * Serial console is not configured  (tflink, 17:08:13)
>  * AGREED: - 728923 - Appears to have been fixed, need confirmation in
>    beta TC1. Close once confirmed.  (tflink, 17:11:42)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730415  (tflink, 17:11:48)
>  * kickstart with user --name=blah results in traceback  (tflink,
>    17:11:56)
>  * fix for 730415 is in anaconda-16.16  (tflink, 17:22:37)
>  * AGREED: - 730415 - RejectedBlocker - There don't seem to be many
>    reports of this and discussions of blocker status are purely
>    academic for pre-freeze fixes. Fix is in anaconda, needs
>    verification  (tflink, 17:23:02)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734861  (tflink, 17:23:13)
>  * text mode install fails ("you have not created a bootloader stage1
>    target device")  (tflink, 17:23:23)
>  * AGREED: - 734861 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
>    complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC
>    installation interfaces  (tflink, 17:30:46)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735016  (tflink, 17:30:55)
>  * reboot halts after preupgrade  (tflink, 17:31:03)
>  * ACTION: tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say
>    "both" instead of "either"  (tflink, 17:33:43)
>  * need more information from reporter  (tflink, 17:35:02)
>  * requested information: logs from preupgrade.  (tflink, 17:37:28)
>  * AGREED: - 735016 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
>    successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
>    updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
>    the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
>    booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
>    release criteria - The bug report is lacking some information, ask
>    reporter for more details  (tflink, 17:38:55)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731248  (tflink, 17:39:03)
>  * [abrt] control-center-3.1.4-1.fc16: Process
>    /usr/bin/gnome-control-center was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
>    (tflink, 17:39:13)
>  * AGREED: - 731248 - AcceptedBlocker - No part of any release-blocking
>    desktop's panel (or equivalent) configuration should crash or be
>    entirely non-functional on boot of the installed system using
>    default installation choices  (tflink, 17:45:58)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734286  (tflink, 17:46:06)
>  * tboot package was not included in install DVD yet  (tflink,
>    17:46:17)
>  * AGREED: - 734286 - RejectedBlocker - missing packages for optional
>    features are not release blocking issues  (tflink, 17:48:25)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734791  (tflink, 17:48:34)
>  * Checksum files for Live have wrong name  (tflink, 17:48:43)
>  * AGREED: - 734791 - AcceptedBlocker - Doesn't hit any release
>    criteria but checksum files need to be correct before release
>    (tflink, 17:54:31)
>  * ACTION: adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and
>    checksum filenames  (tflink, 17:55:30)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735037  (tflink, 17:55:46)
>  * F16-Beta.TC1 - Yum update results in - "Check that the correct key
>    URLs are configured for this repository" error message  (tflink,
>    17:55:54)
>  * AGREED: - 735037 - RejectedBlocker - This was an issue with a
>    package that shouldn't have made it in to the F16 repos, has been
>    taken care of  (tflink, 18:00:44)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734903  (tflink, 18:00:54)
>  * having dnsmasq start by default and bind to all interfaces breaks
>    libvirt bridging  (tflink, 18:01:03)
>  * AGREED: - 734903 - RejectedBlocker, AcceptedNTH - While it does
>    violate "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a
>    situationwhere the virtual host is running the same release (using
>    Fedora's current preferred virtualization technology)" - it is very
>    easy to work around and probably only affects upgrades  (tflink,
>    18:08:58)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735259  (tflink, 18:09:08)
>  * after updating grub2, booting drops me to grub rescue prompt
>    (tflink, 18:09:16)
>  * AGREED: - 735259 - AcceptedBlocker - The installed system must be
>    able to download and install updates with yum and the default
>    graphical package manager in all release-blocking desktops  (tflink,
>    18:15:37)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731297  (tflink, 18:15:49)
>  * gxine-0.5.905-6 can't re-play music after stop playing  (tflink,
>    18:15:57)
>  * AGREED: - 731297 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedNTH - gxine is only on
>    LXDE and is nth since that's not the default DE  (tflink, 18:20:00)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735199  (tflink, 18:20:09)
>  * "mount -t squashfs" fails  (tflink, 18:20:18)
>  * ACTION: tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing  (tflink,
>    18:23:19)
>  * AGREED: - 735199 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
>    complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC
>    installation interfaces  (tflink, 18:24:31)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734845  (tflink, 18:24:41)
>  * repoclosure failure in 16-Beta.TC1 DVDs  (tflink, 18:24:50)
>  * AGREED: - 734845 - AcceptedBlocker - (alpha criterion) There must be
>    no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict
>    but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or
>    unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install
>    (tflink, 18:27:33)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728193  (tflink, 18:28:09)
>  * preupgrade cannot retrieve repomd.xml  (tflink, 18:28:17)
>  * AGREED: - 728193 - AcceptedBlocker - The installer must be able to
>    successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
>    updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
>    the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
>    booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
>    release criteria  (tflink, 18:30:35)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735013  (tflink, 18:30:45)
>  * Having unit B bound or required to unit A and restarting unit A
>    while it's active results hang  (tflink, 18:30:58)
>  * LINK: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39824 is a whole
>    lot more readable  (pjones, 18:33:44)
>  * AGREED: - 735013 - The impact of this bug is unclear and more
>    information is needed before making a decision on blocker status
>    (tflink, 18:36:50)
>  * AGREED: - 731240 - RejectedBlocker - doesn't hit any of the release
>    criteria  (tflink, 18:41:05)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498207  (tflink, 18:44:04)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735027  (tflink, 18:45:23)
>  * Failed to install repository NFSISO default  (tflink, 18:45:55)
>  * AGREED: - 735027 - CLOSED NOTABUG - the original test case was not
>    valid, later testing reproduced another, already tracked issue
>    (727522)  (tflink, 18:50:28)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678456  (tflink, 18:50:39)
>  * GRUB 2 requires os-prober to detect other installed operating
>    systems  (tflink, 18:50:48)
>  * AGREED: - 678456 - AcceptedNTH - This is a final blocker but the fix
>    is pretty simple and would be nice to have for beta  (tflink,
>    18:53:02)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734959  (tflink, 18:53:15)
>  * grub2 needs to require 'which'  (tflink, 18:53:25)
>  * AGREED: - 734959 - AcceptedNTH - This is a final blocker but the fix
>    is pretty simple and would be nice to have for beta  (tflink,
>    18:55:14)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669120  (tflink, 18:55:24)
>  * Track down and modify PRODUCT string for cleaner syslinux display
>    (tflink, 18:55:34)
>  * AGREED: - 669120 - AcceptedNTH - Not catastrophic but it looks bad
>    and now would be a good time to fix it  (tflink, 18:58:00)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734169  (tflink, 18:58:21)
>  * Updated syslinux theme for Fedora 16  (tflink, 18:58:30)
>  * AGREED: - 734169 - this is a tracker bug, will evaluate dependencies
>    on their own  (tflink, 19:02:32)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734173  (tflink, 19:02:43)
>  * New syslinux theme for F16 Live media  (tflink, 19:02:52)
>  * AGREED: - 734173 - AcceptedNTH - This is a bit big of a change for
>    this late but it would be nice to see this happen. Will create test
>    boot.iso and/or live images to test with before TC2 or RC1  (tflink,
>    19:09:03)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734170  (tflink, 19:09:16)
>  * New syslinux theme for F16 DVD  (tflink, 19:09:25)
>  * AGREED: - 734170 - AcceptedNTH - This is a small change and should
>    happen with the livecd changes in 734173  (tflink, 19:11:18)
>  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705189 , right?
>    (adamw, 19:12:49)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705189  (tflink, 19:13:00)
>  * Live install needs a 'reboot' button  (tflink, 19:13:11)
>  * AGREED: 705189 - AcceptedNTH - A tested fix would be accepted past
>    freeze if the anaconda team chooses to move forward with a fix for
>    this bug  (tflink, 19:19:24)
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733808  (tflink, 19:19:52)
>  * Installer shrink function fails when asked to shrink an NTFS
>    Partition  (tflink, 19:20:03)
>  * AGREED: 733808 - AcceptedNTH - Resizing partitions isn't supported
>    but a small, tested fix would be accepted during freeze if it came
>    to that  (tflink, 19:28:13)
>
> * open discussion  (tflink, 19:28:47)
>  * The next blocker bug review meeting will be 2011-09-09 @ 17:00 UTC
>    in #fedora-bugzappers  (tflink, 19:30:28)
>  * brunowolff is still triaging a bug related to the 3.1 kernel and
>    raid, he will update as more information is available  (tflink,
>    19:32:14)
>
> Meeting ended at 19:34:34 UTC.
>
>
>
>
> Action Items
> ------------
> * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
>  instead of "either"
> * adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and checksum
>  filenames
> * tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing
>
>
>
>
> Action Items, by person
> -----------------------
> * adamw
>  * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
>    instead of "either"
>  * adamw propose release criteria for media checksums and checksum
>    filenames
> * tflink
>  * tflink or adamw - update beta release requirement to say "both"
>    instead of "either"
>  * tflink build boot.iso with new dracut for testing
> * **UNASSIGNED**
>  * (none)
>
>
>
>
> People Present (lines said)
> ---------------------------
> * tflink (307)
> * adamw (250)
> * pjones (63)
> * bcl (55)
> * mizmo (35)
> * buggbot (31)
> * elad661 (16)
> * jwb (13)
> * brunowolff (11)
> * zodbot (8)
> * rbergeron (8)
> * robatino (6)
> * steve555 (5)
> * bodhi_zazen (4)
> * jlk (4)
> * nirik (2)
> * mclasen (2)
> * athmane (2)
>
>
>
>
> Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
>
> .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux