>>>>> "NP" == Nils Philippsen <nils@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: NP> Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be NP> able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have NP> "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? This is covered by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Basically, you are encouraged to separate differently licensed pieces of code into subpackages with different licensing. However, it is sufficient to simply indicate all of the licenses in the License: tag and include an explanation of which files in the binary package are under which license. (Various methods for doing this are given in the URL above.) - J< -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
