On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:28 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 01.09.11 15:13, Nils Philippsen (nils@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 13:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 01.09.11 13:49, Nils Philippsen (nils@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > > > > We actually support this for quite some time now in F16. You can get a > > > > > list of all unit files that are installed with their enablement status, > > > > > and you get notifications if their state changes. You have bus calls to > > > > > enable/disable/link/mask/unmask units files. So it should all be there. > > > > > > > > > > The bus interfaces are not really documented very well, but it's quite > > > > > straight-forward I think and fully introspectable. If you have > > > > > questions, please ping me. > > > > > > > > Cool. I guess I'll use that if available and fall back to running > > > > systemctl is-enabled/enable/disable if not. > > > > > > Why the fallback? > > > > Fedora 15. > > I thoiught we had the official policy these days that released > distributions do not receive feature upgrades, but only bugfixes and > security fixes. I am not sure how adding support for this bus interface > would qualify as bugfix/security fix... That's why I don't ask you to implement on systemd's dbus interface but roll it in my own, allowing me to keep things consolidated between releases. From the POV of a s-c-services user not being able to enable/disable services is a deficiency in F-15 over F-14 and earlier that needs fixing. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
