On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 08:43 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:23:25 +0200 > Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:49:37 +0000 (UTC), J (JB) wrote: > > > > > Kalev Lember <kalevlember <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > ... > > > > Just a wild guess -- what version of glibc do you have? For a > > > > short while updates-testing had glibc-2.14.90-6 that made lots of > > > > apps crash. yum downgrade 'glibc*' should fix it if that's the > > > > case. > > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.14.90-6 > > > > > > I downgraded to: > > > glibc.i686 2.14.90-4 @fedora > > > and just got a crash again (dump submitted via Firefox built-in > > > reporter). > > > > Yeah, the -4 release is faulty: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/730856 > > Comment 3 in that ticket mentions a scratch-build that includes the > > upstream patch, but the build is called 2.14.90-6 which is the same > > version-release as the broken test update mentioned further above. > > > > Rule of thumb: If scratch-builds contain something not added in pkg > > git, modify %{release} appropriately and add a string like .test1 > > or .1.test > > Sorry about that (I made the scratch build). I was sure hoping it would > have been fixed and pushed out in a real update long before now. ;( Your scratch build has also now expired. I just built myself a 4.1 with the patch included...it's pretty easy to do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
