2011-07-22 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #2 - recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.log.html

Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (jlaska, 17:00:17)

* Basic information  (jlaska, 17:03:23)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (jlaska, 17:03:26)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (jlaska, 17:03:30)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
    (jlaska, 17:03:35)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722963  (jlaska, 17:05:36)
  * TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not str  (jlaska,
    17:05:46)
  * AGREED: 722963 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Final - appears to involve
    manual partition scenarios where the partition is not within the
    size limits for the format selected  (jlaska, 17:11:31)
  * Patch out for review on anaconda-devel, likely will be fixed well
    before F16Final  (jlaska, 17:11:45)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723144  (jlaska, 17:12:03)
  * anaconda 16.12 crashed after the partition process  (jlaska,
    17:12:09)
  * ACTION: jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for
    paritioning to include [X] Use LVM?  (jlaska, 17:14:34)
  * AGREED: 723144 - AcceptedBlocker - Impacts default partition
    scenario and Alpha partition criteria  (jlaska, 17:15:42)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723345  (jlaska, 17:16:35)
  * Rescue mode fails - TypeError: progressWindow() takes exactly 4
    arguments (6 given)  (jlaska, 17:16:40)
  * affects the Alpha criteria - "The rescue mode of the installer must
    start successfully and be able to detect and mount an existing
    default installation "  (jlaska, 17:16:51)
  * AGREED: 723345 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Alpha - impacts rescue mode
    Alpha criteria  (jlaska, 17:18:36)
  * Already fixed in anaconda-16.13-1  (jlaska, 17:18:57)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723475  (jlaska, 17:19:09)
  * anaconda-16.12 - Unable to activate networking in anaconda (stage2)
    (jlaska, 17:19:15)
  * group debated whether workaround of booting with "asknetwork" is
    acceptable for Alpha  (jlaska, 17:32:22)
  * AGREED: 723475 - unable to determine if workaround is acceptable for
    Alpha, review blocker status again next week with more details on
    failure  (jlaska, 17:40:40)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725040  (jlaska, 17:41:17)
  * rawhide installs generic-release package, instead of fedora-release
    (jlaska, 17:41:21)
  * AGREED: 725040 - AcceptedNTH for F16Alpha - leave on proposed
    blocker list until we can confirm this does not impact artwork
    (jlaska, 17:54:58)
  * adamw noted this bug may impact more than just artwork ... further
    investigation needed  (jlaska, 17:56:15)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723526  (jlaska, 17:56:27)
  * firstboot always runs even with RUN_FIRSTBOOT=NO in
    /etc/sysconfig/firstboot  (jlaska, 17:56:40)
  * AGREED: 723526 - Need more information to confirm whether bug exists
    after a *fresh* install  (jlaska, 18:03:40)
  * ACTION: need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a
    *fresh* install  (jlaska, 18:03:55)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718722  (jlaska, 18:04:16)
  * Mismatched or corrupt version of stage1/stage2  (jlaska, 18:04:21)
  * AGREED: 718722 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Beta, CommonBugs? - only
    impacts upgrades from F15 which is covered by beta criteria
    (jlaska, 18:09:51)
  * pjones plans to investigate and we'll revisit if the severity
    increases  (jlaska, 18:11:11)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723901  (jlaska, 18:11:14)
  * pre-release anaconda compose is disabling 'rawhide' repo ... leaves
    no repos available for install  (jlaska, 18:11:19)
  * likely related to generic-release vs fedora-release troubles
    (jlaska, 18:19:27)
  * AGREED: 723901 - revisit next meeting - impacts rawhide installs
    now, but unclear whether this will affect Branched (f16) media
    installs too  (jlaska, 18:21:12)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690930  (jlaska, 18:21:23)
  * microcode_ctl loops, impossible to boot  (jlaska, 18:21:34)
  * LINK: http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders <-- jlaska might
    want to add this to info for the previous bug  (pjones, 18:23:57)
  * AGREED: 690930 - AcceptedBlocker - bootable AMD systems favored over
    intel microcode update support for Alpha ... if no fix available,
    re-apply broken fix to allow AMD systems to boot  (jlaska, 18:29:00)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720034  (jlaska, 18:30:43)
  * AGREED: 720034 - request updated status in bug and revisit/retest
    before next meeting  (jlaska, 18:33:56)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714478  (jlaska, 18:34:07)
  * CPU lockup during boot  (jlaska, 18:35:03)
  * AGREED: 714478 - brunowolff confirmed this issue is resolved in
    latest rawhide kernel, move to CLOSED  (jlaska, 18:37:04)

* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723160  (jlaska, 18:37:18)
  * Gnome-shell presents enormous warning dialog  (jlaska, 18:37:23)
  * Unclear on impact, could be bad if impacts desktop in all VMs
    (jlaska, 18:40:25)
  * AGREED: More testing of live images needed to determine scope of
    failure  (jlaska, 18:42:16)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=724928  (jlaska,
  18:42:32)
  * ACTION: jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown
    work as intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)
    (jlaska, 18:46:24)
  * AGREED: 724928 - AcceptedBlocker for F16Alpha - tentatively accepted
    for pending alpha criteria for proper shutdown/reboot behavior
    (jlaska, 18:47:59)

* Open discussion - <your bug here>  (jlaska, 18:48:08)

Meeting ended at 18:51:05 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for paritioning
  to include [X] Use LVM?
* need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a *fresh*
  install
* jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown work as
  intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jlaska
  * jlaska will propose rewording Alpha release criteria for paritioning
    to include [X] Use LVM?
  * jlaska - draft Alpha criteria to ensure that reboot/shutdown work as
    intended (desktop reboot/shutdown already covered in Beta)
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * need confirmation whether firstboot is activated after a *fresh*
    install




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* jlaska (309)
* adamw (145)
* pjones (66)
* tflink (52)
* Viking-Ice (45)
* buggbot (13)
* bcl (12)
* zodbot (4)
* brunowolff (4)
* robatino (2)
* athmane (2)
* nirik (1)
* rbergeron (1)
* satellit_ (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux