On 07/21/2011 12:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote: >> >> >> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that >> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years >> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :( > > It should concern you very much that you are accusing a long term > contributor of 7 years like me of having a secret agenda. There isn't > one. Any reasonable person would agree (and smolt stats can verify) > that Fedora's shorter life cycle and agility isn't a good fit for > servers typically. If you want Fedora to have a long lifecyle and be > a good fit for servers, be my guest and volunteer to do the work and I > am happy to volunteer along with you. Otherwise, you are just > engaging in back seat driving. > > Rahul Rahul, I did not accuse you of anything except your outstanding contribution. I did say "I really get the feeling there is another agenda at work here" and what I was hinting at, was that Redhat are setting the Fedora agenda such that it NEVER becomes stable. And a later post affirms my exact concern (see further down this thread). Albert. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
