On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 00:16, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/20/2011 07:11 AM, Peter Reed wrote: >> This will not resolve the dependency problem. It requires all the i686 >> packages not the x86_64 packages I do not think it is a true x86_64 based >> package. I would have to run it each time to see what the next depency it >> would fail on and install that i686 package until I finnally got it to run. >> Friggin' pain in the butt. > > Well, for various reasons, I'm back on 32bit....but when I was on 64bit > 2 months ago I'm somewhat certain that "yum localinstall" brought in the > redhat-lsb package. When i last installed it yum install did bring in the dependencies (pretty sure install and localinstall do the same in that respect). Unfortunately it brought in the x86_64 version of various libraries. Unfortunately Google provide x86_64 rpms for most of their stuff but a lot of it is actually x86_32. I can only assume they package them as x86_64 only for appearances or easy upgrading if they decide to provide actual x86_64 in the future. Most likely both. -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't... -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
