On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:18 PM lejeczek <peljasz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi guys.
I wonder if someone might have seen _cobbler_ trying to claim this.
I've tried a few sebools but regardless SELinux denies cobbler:
#============= cobblerd_t ==============
allow cobblerd_t self:capability dac_override;
and from what I gather _dac_override_ is pretty big thing and I wonder if _cobbler_ should have it.
Hi,
If you can reproduce it, use one of the debugging option to find out access to which file triggers it:
_______________________________________________
many thanks, L.
selinux mailing list -- selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Zdenek Pytela
Security SELinux team
_______________________________________________ selinux mailing list -- selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
