Re: Selinux for RAMFS implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ondrej ,

Thanks for sharing valuable information.

1) Since it's in an evaluation state , we might have a chance to look at tmpfs options .
    Can you please share  some pointers on this option ?


2) Worst case scenario , if we can't go ahead with a tmpfs approach ..
    a) Are there any specific files / directories or services that might create a problem ?
          Or if 
    b) Any way we can customize STOCK fedora policies ( so that they can work with RAMFS)
        (  I can sense that this option might be complex , time-consuming & risky
           But in case ramfs is mandatory , at-least we will know the effort & plan schedule accordingly )


Thanks for sharing the comment as it has definitely saved us some time & 
will help us to use Fedora in a better way . 


Thanks ,
Ashish Kumar Mishra  
_______________________________________________
selinux mailing list -- selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux