On 06/13/2016 09:44 PM, David Highley wrote:
Should we file a report on the issue below?
time->Mon Jun 13 08:50:37 2016
type=AVC msg=audit(1465833037.215:3116): avc: denied { create } for
pid=5356 comm="procmail" name="_sTB.NZtXXB.douglas"
scontext=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
----
time->Mon Jun 13 08:50:37 2016
type=AVC msg=audit(1465833037.215:3117): avc: denied { create } for
pid=5356 comm="procmail" name="spamlog"
scontext=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
----
time->Mon Jun 13 08:50:37 2016
type=AVC msg=audit(1465833037.215:3118): avc: denied { create } for
pid=5356 comm="procmail" name="_sTB,NZtXXB.douglas"
scontext=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
----
time->Mon Jun 13 08:50:37 2016
type=AVC msg=audit(1465833037.215:3119): avc: denied { create } for
pid=5356 comm="procmail" name="spamlog"
scontext=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here's a 6-year-old thread discussing this same issue. Apparently it's
still unresolved since I'm still using the local policy mentioned in the
thread.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/XEFMGBHPWHLCZWB6EE3JYVRJZKQBN4H2/#XEFMGBHPWHLCZWB6EE3JYVRJZKQBN4H2
--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
