Re: [selinux] SElinux newbie question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/15/2015 01:57 AM, David Li wrote:
> My next question is why my file isn't labelled correctly.
> 
> My .fc file has the label defined as:
> 
> /usr/sbin/myapp -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:myapp_exec_t,s0)
> 
> After install the targeted RPM and relabel by using fixfiles relabel,
> the file "/usr/sbin/myapp" looks like this:
> 
> $ ls -Z /usr/sbin/myapp
> -rwxr-xr-x. root root unconfined_u:object_r:myapp_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/myapp
> 
> So the domain has been labeled correctly but the user now becomes
> "unconfined". Why?

You need to be sure you have defined transition rules from unconfined_t
to myapp_t. If you want to confine your application which is started
directly from the command line for example, you need to define proper
rules for it.

Fox example we have

gpsd_run(unconfined_t, unconfined_r)

where

interface(`gpsd_run',`
    gen_require(`
        attribute_role gpsd_roles;
    ')

    gpsd_domtrans($1)
    roleattribute $2 gpsd_roles;
')


Feel free to send me or paste here your policy and we can check it together.



> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:46 PM, David Li <dlipubkey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Robin,
>> yep, that worked!
>> My policy is actually built into the targeted RPM. So I don't need to
>> do semodule again.
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Robin Lee Powell
>> <rlpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Assuming CentOS is the same as Fedora in this regard, you'll want
>>> selinux-policy-targeted (which is the normal SELinux user policy)
>>> and whatever package includes /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
>>> (which is how you make modules; make a directory with only your .te
>>> and maybe .fc file, and run: /usr/bin/make -f
>>> /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile , and then semodule -i modname.pp )
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:41:18PM -0700, David Li wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am using CentOS 7.1 and just built the following new Selinux policy
>>>> RPMs. I wonder which one I should use in install.  Or do I need to
>>>> install all of them?
>>>>
>>>> My purpose is to test a simple policy that I wrote.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [admin@localhost noarch]$ ll
>>>> total 8996
>>>> -rw-rw-r--. 1 admin admin  361920 Oct 14 11:47
>>>> selinux-policy-3.13.1-23.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>> -rw-rw-r--. 1 admin admin 3467872 Oct 14 11:47
>>>> selinux-policy-devel-3.13.1-23.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>> -rw-rw-r--. 1 admin admin  917644 Oct 14 11:47
>>>> selinux-policy-doc-3.13.1-23.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>> -rw-rw-r--. 1 admin admin  365812 Oct 14 11:47
>>>> selinux-policy-sandbox-3.13.1-23.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>> -rw-rw-r--. 1 admin admin 4084412 Oct 14 11:47
>>>> selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-23.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> --
>>>> selinux mailing list
>>>> selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
> --
> selinux mailing list
> selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
> 


-- 
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux