On 04/04/2015 04:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It is supposed to fail. > Ok thanks. So at the moment this makes btrfs receive and Samba > incompatible on the same volume. Mounting different subvolumes with > different -o context= values of course doesn't work, while subvolumes > are separate fs trees they still share a superblock. > SELinux: mount invalid. Same superblock, different security settings > for (dev sdd1, type btrfs) > > Is there a way to avoid using mount -o context? What about chcon -Rt > samba_share_t on the subvolume that will be Samba shared, leaving > other subvolumes with default labeling for btrfs receive? > > > That should work. -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
