Re: High weirdness and questionable utility of restorecond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:46:14 -0500, Jonathan Abbey wrote:
| [..]
| 
| I then restart restorecond, and 
| 
| ** I no longer see the error about the missing user home directory. **

Sorry about that; I did what I should have done before mailing before
and just set the max_watches back to 8192 and stopped and restarted
restorecond, and no more missing user home directory message.

I don't know if the utmp record that had the non-existent
'/home/falazar' entry in it timed out or what, but it seems that the
missing home directory message is still missing.

Given that this is happening with max_watches set far too low to
handle recursive directory watches under /home, I'm going to assume
that the restorecond code at selinuxproject actually does closely
reflect what RHEL 6 is shipping, and recursion just isn't supported
with restorecond.

 Jon

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Abbey 				              jonabbey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Applied Research Laboratories                 The University of Texas at Austin
GPG Key: 71767586 at keyserver pgp.mit.edu, http://www.ganymeta.org/workkey.gpg

Attachment: pgpAaPHZRZhcj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux