On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 13:34 +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote: > > > There is no need to have own private type for /etc/tayga if it is > read-only. > <<snip>> > > Is there a unit file? With that reasoning there is no need for a private type for service units either After all they aren't written to either The private type for this config file is handy for a (missing) tyaga_admin() interface. So that tayga administrators can modify the configuration files, just like a tayga_unit_file_t type fpr service unit would enable administrators to modify the service unit and manage the service via the service unit. -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
