Re: [RFC] Adding --force option to semodule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

semodule -i mypolicy.pp

is equivalent to

semodule -u --force mypolicy.pp

On 03/14/2014 10:07 PM, Shintaro Fujiwara wrote:
> Hi, I was updating a policy because I had to add some permissions.
> 
> So, I added number in .te file and successfully upgraded mypolicy.
> 
> semodule -u mypolicy.pp
> 
> 5 minutes later, I found another permission should have been added to 
> mypolicy.pp so I added it and .te number remains the same.
> 
> Yes, I should have added permissions at one time and make no haste.
> 
> But, isn't it convenient to add --force option to semodule ? Now, if the
> number is the same, I get this error.
> 
> [root@localhost xx]# semodule -u mypolicy.pp 
> libsemanage.get_direct_upgrade_filename: Previous module mypolicy is same
> or newer. (No such file or directory).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 日本にヘヴィメタル・ハードロックを根付かせるページ http://heavymetalhardrock.no-ip.info/
> <http://www.heavymetalhardrock.tk/>
> 
> 世界中でセキュアOSのSELinuxを使いやすくするフリーソフト http://sourceforge.net/projects/segatex/
> 
> CMS(PHPとPostgreSQLを使ったフリーソフト) http://sourceforge.net/projects/webon/
> 
> 
> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlMkJZsACgkQrlYvE4MpobNNswCdEduTFcji/0kftHtI0ccjNmhB
5jgAoIn1p6MB6o70t+M2NXS9HyuS8Fa2
=2HR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux