Re: postgresql and nfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 16:09 -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> CentOS 6.4
> selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch
> Permissive (of course)
> 
> postgresql is trying to read on an nfs-mounted directory. setsebool
> allow_user_postgresql_connect on
> use_nfs_home_dirs --> on
> 
> And if I use audit2allow, it wants to make a policy of
> #============= postgresql_t ==============
> allow postgresql_t nfs_t:dir search;
> 
> Should there be a boolean, or is this a policy oversight? And in the
> meantime, should I just make the local policy?

if audit2why say's "missing TE rule" then it is oversight, and then youd
need to create your own modification if you want that functionality

> 
>       mark
> 
> --
> selinux mailing list
> selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux


--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux