David Quigley wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 10:12, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> David Quigley wrote:
<snip>
>>> Attached is my first crack at the argparse version of semanage.
<snip>
>> Well, if you're screwing with semanage's syntax... can't the bizarre
syntax of wildcards be changed to something *normal*? Y'know, like make
semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_content_t /web\*
>> ?
>> And why doesn't semanage have a was to set -t u?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your last question. Also I'm trying not to
mess with the syntax so we don't obsolete all the documentation out
there.
>
Maybe, but the semanage syntax for wildcards is *utterly* unlike any other
usage - any shell, or perl, or whatever, and I see absolutely no reason to
have it so different. I guarantee it confuses people - I had problems just
a bit ago.
And the second note - if there's a syntax for semanage that lets me change
user context, I don't see it - the -s doesn't seem to let me do, for
example, -s system_u.
mark
--
mark's standard complaint about the selinux list: NO OTHER LIST I'm on, or
have been on in the 22 years I've been on the 'Net, is configured to have
reply, rather than reply all, reply to the sender, rather than the list.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
