Re: Backups with rsync totally broken in Fedora 18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/21/2013 12:49 PM, David Highley wrote:
> "Daniel J Walsh wrote:"
>> 
> On 01/18/2013 09:29 PM, David Highley wrote:
>>>> "David Highley wrote:"
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Daniel J Walsh wrote:"
>>>>>> 
>>>> On 01/18/2013 09:20 AM, David Highley wrote:
>>>>>>>> Upgraded a test box to Fedora 18 and have tried to get rsync 
>>>>>>>> backups to it working. Looked at many discussions about
>>>>>>>> backing up in a selinux environment and all discussions
>>>>>>>> seemed to be incomplete.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Most indicate you should not keep selinux labels, but none of
>>>>>>>> those discussion indicate what options to change. After
>>>>>>>> working on a thousand line policy file I'm beginning to think
>>>>>>>> you just want to completely turn off any audit of the rsync
>>>>>>>> domain.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Is this how we should approach backups? If you do not
>>>>>>>> preserve selinux labels what should the backup location get
>>>>>>>> labeled to?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm surprised as long as selinux has been in use that a
>>>>>>>> template with details has not been defined for this. By the
>>>>>>>> way I had just submitted an enhancement bug report for rsync
>>>>>>>> with examples of getting it to function with systemd control.
>>>>>>>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> Does this help?
>>>> 
>>>> http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/61646.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I had found and read this information, but was not sure from it
>>>>>> and the other discussions that it was the right direction and if
>>>>>> the right direction that it had complete information for doing
>>>>>> the implementation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Has anyone tried this and has it worked out? Do you define the
>>>>>> backup area as unconfined_u and relabel everything to that?
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> OK, making rsync_t and unconfined domain gets rid of the AVCs. I
>>>>> still have concerns that it is just opening up a bad whole in the
>>>>> system. Is there a way of scoping it to only the back up area and
>>>>> or maybe forcing what ever is copied to a benign state by labeling
>>>>> it to something safe?
>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>>>>> 
>>>> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>>>> 
> 
> Well rsync_t policy if for running rsync as a daemon not as a client.
> 
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/rsyncd.service
> 
> I just checked a fix into the policy so that only rsynd when run as a
> service will transition to rsync_t.  But if you run it from a script or an
> application running as initrc_t, it will stay as the current domain.
> 
>> Thanks, will check again when it is available. We are using rsync as 
>> daemon spond by systemd.
> 
> 
> If you are only running rsync as a client, adding
> unconfined_domain(rsync_t) will not give it more privs that initrc_t
> already has.
>> 
> 
> 

Ok then that is different, what is broken for you?  Without the
unconfined_domain(rsync_t)?

Sorry for the confusion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlD9pXwACgkQrlYvE4MpobMh+ACfSzBvxAmr4/YGBIalRhDZb4PG
4AIAoLKpOti8B+xESEQk8Y5THXHzy0AH
=DTEh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux