Re: No default labels, is it intentional?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
From: Göran Uddeborg <goeran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:58:53 +0100
Cc: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50F5C13E.50205@redhat.com>
References: <20725.21913.590957.20594@freddi.uddeborg> <1358259349.8690.25.camel@d30> <50F56E84.8090602@redhat.com> <20725.49258.347763.148341@freddi.uddeborg> <50F5C13E.50205@redhat.com>

> cat /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/customizable_types

Ah, that easy! :-)

Attachment: pgpj5rTo5_tYY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

References:
- No default labels, is it intentional?
  - From: Göran Uddeborg
- Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
  - From: Dominick Grift
- Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
  - From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
  - From: Göran Uddeborg
- Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
  - From: Daniel J Walsh

Prev by Date: Difference between unconfined and unconfineduser modules
Next by Date: Re: Difference between unconfined and unconfineduser modules
Previous by thread: Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
Next by thread: Re: No default labels, is it intentional?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Campsites] [KDE Users] [Gnome Users]

Powered by Linux