On 12/17/2012 09:33 AM, grift wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 00:05 +0100, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > >> A .te is contained in SPEC-File: >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/BackupPC.git/tree/BackupPC.spec >> > This does not look half as bad as i thought it would. it works with the Epel-Package in CentOS. > I guess you could temporarily implement that as a workaround. I fear, that the "duplicate errors" concerning the global selinux policy is a blocker for this workaround at the time. The bug report is not assigned since now. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887640 > Some how the backuppc policy that was packaged with backuppc does not > seem to take effect. The maintainer of backuppc package should work ith > us to support this package properly It is bjohnson https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/BackupPC?_csrf_token=f2fad3ac6437b48a8393673a39011cec54f54425 Can you contact him/her? I don't see contact data in external view. fyi and kind regards Gabriele -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
