Daniel J Walsh pise: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/27/2012 10:34 AM, Sergio wrote: > > > >>>> > >>>> The policy configuration supports two options: > >>>> > >>>> 1. silently deny this: setsebool -P > >>> vbetool_mmap_zero_ignore on > >>>> > >>>> or > >>>> > >>>> 2. allow this: setsebool -P mmap_low_allowed on > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> A better solution is probably > >>> > >>> yum remove vbetool > >>> > >>> Since most people do not need it. > >> > > > > For the while I went with > > > > # setsebool -P mmap_low_allowed on > > > > And it's taking quite a while to complete the job. The command is using > > almost all of my old Athlon CPU for quite some time already. > > > > Is this normal? > > > > Note: last selinux-policy-targeted update got stuck and I eventually had to > > stop it and then complete it afterwards (with yum-complete-transaction). > > Just saying to give a perspective. Maybe I should stop the setsebool > > process (not doing anything now in case I get an answer)? -- selinux > > mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > > > > > > setsebool -P and semanage commands are slow, they are doing a full recompile > of all policy. OK, I understand this. But what's the reason to be semanage boolean -l much slower than getsebool -a No recompiling, just gathering the booleans default state and short summary in addition to the second command. -- --Zdenek Pytela, <pytela@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux